sample objections to interrogatories florida

/K [12] /K [9] endobj /Type /StructElem <> 161 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> 43 0 obj /S /LBody /Pg 17 0 R << /Pg 22 0 R /Resources 363 0 R 14 [154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 290 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R endobj /Count 22 /K [7] /Type /StructElem <> /Pg 18 0 R << /Type /StructElem /K [6] /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /Pg 34 0 R 266 0 obj /P 476 0 R >> endobj 0000004919 00000 n 250 0 obj /MarkInfo 2 0 R Aninterrogatory is not objectionable becausean answer to it involves an opinion or con-tention that relates to fact or the applica-tion of law to fact, or would be based oninformation obtained or legal theories de-veloped in anticipation of litigation or inpreparation of trial." 134 0 obj 263 0 obj 173 0 obj /Type /StructElem endstream endobj 659 0 obj <>stream 2018 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. /S /P << >> /P 10 0 R endobj 265 0 obj << /StructParents 16 Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery For a more detailed discussion of the invocation of privilege, see. endobj /Type /StructElem /K [4] %PDF-1.4 << >> 4 0 obj << << /Pg 27 0 R /Type /Page >> 92 0 obj ) ) ) ) defendants. ) Objections A. /P 472 0 R 298 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /K [9] /Pg 14 0 R 123 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /S /P /K [1] /K 13 249 0 obj /P 476 0 R << /P 10 0 R /A 439 0 R Absent compelling circumstances, failure to assert objections to an interrogatory within the time for answers constitutes a waiver and will preclude a party from asserting the objection in a response to a motion to compel. 287 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /K [0] This website uses Google Translate, a free service. /Pg 15 0 R %PDF-1.5 /S /P When photographs seemingly disappeared after the plaintiffs deposition, the defendant moved to compel inspection of the plaintiffs Facebook profile. << /K [18] 303 0 obj /P 10 0 R /ABCpdf 8123 endobj << /StructParents 14 /S /P 18 0 obj >> 318 0 obj endobj /Pages 6 0 R /StructParents 18 /Pg 29 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj 288 0 obj endobj endobj /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 0000052510 00000 n 241 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 17 0 R >> >> /P 10 0 R >> /K [0] << /K [0] /Pg 14 0 R /K [10] /Resources 398 0 R /P 472 0 R endobj << >> /S /P /K [37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 35 0 R 45 0 R /RoleMap 8 0 R 208 0 obj /S /L >> /Type /StructElem RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 65 0 obj << Ten interrogatories, including subparts, may be sent to a party, in addition to the standard interrogatories contained in Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (b) or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (c). x+ | /P 10 0 R >> Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. 229 0 obj >> >> /Pg 29 0 R << /K [32] /P 10 0 R Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. << /S /LBody /P 473 0 R /S /P 0 >> /S /P endobj /Pg 25 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R >> /K [0] /Pg 19 0 R 149 0 obj /K [6] /Annots [] >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /StructParents 10 /K [2] /P 474 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /Type /Page /Root 73 0 R << /Type /StructElem /P 476 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R >> 283 0 obj 78 0 obj << /A 455 0 R /A 467 0 R /P 445 0 R /Type /StructElem 317 0 obj >> /Pg 13 0 R /Type /Page 53 0 obj I graduated with a bachelor of science . /Type /StructElem xc```g``[d 6+Chddv]0 (!BAA4A(9z7jF6 /Pg 14 0 R << >> 308 0 obj << /Type /Page endobj 199 0 obj /Tabs /S /StructParents 17 /Pg 27 0 R /S /L >> 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300 /S /P 4 [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 320 0 obj /S /P /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R >> /S /P /Contents [375 0 R 376 0 R 377 0 R] /P 10 0 R [1] >> << endobj >> When an answer is narrowed by one or more objections, this fact and the nature of the information withheld should be specified in the response itself. >> /K [1] General or blanket objections should be used only when they apply to every request. >> /Type /StructElem << /K [16] endobj /K [4] /K [5] /Type /StructElem 167 0 obj /S /LBody endobj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 6 0 obj /P 10 0 R P~N1elO( /Annots [] /S /P Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. /Pg 34 0 R 156 0 obj 243 0 obj 15 [170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 291 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R] /P 472 0 R P. 1.280(e). /P 10 0 R As with any discovery request, defense attorneys should be careful to limit their requests only to relevant and reasonably calculated information. General or blanket objections should be used only when they apply to every interrogatory. /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /K [4] /K [8] /Pg 18 0 R endobj /Pg 19 0 R /K [18] /Pg 34 0 R /K [11] endobj /P 472 0 R /S /P >> /K [9] /S /P /P 477 0 R %%EOF << >> >> << After the trial court denied its motion, the defendant filed narrower discovery requests. /Pg 15 0 R /K [2] /P 10 0 R endobj endobj /Type /StructElem hb```FB ea8$$zPi@ &+on;00\?L\`h`h`16k@@0*33d1L5\ "uZ#&4l /K 27 << /Type /StructElem << Nonspecific objections do not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules and will not be sustained by this Court. >> /StructParents 8 /S /P /S /P 187 0 obj >> >> hWmo6:87q8`7 {m.hy+KDfHI](. /S /Span /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 275 0 obj 186 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /P 442 0 R >> /K [2] /P 472 0 R /K 25 60 0 obj<>stream << /K [11] /P 474 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /Group 324 0 R >> /Type /Page /Type /StructElem /Parent 6 0 R >> /K [1] /S /P 175 0 obj endobj /Contents [350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R] endobj << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P >> endobj /Pg 31 0 R /P 10 0 R 0 /Length 483 0 R 313 0 obj 192 0 obj << endobj /K [25] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R P. 1.340(b). endobj endstream << >> << /Pg 34 0 R /K [3] 0000173956 00000 n >> << /Type /StructElem /K [1] endobj While seemingly still a modern marvel, social media as we know it today is actually entering its teenage years. /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem << << endobj /Type /StructElem This avoids drawing an objection from opposing counsel where the . :Fx)QP/IZ}:&_M)u"; _PB:8#\j*D2#flIc.TJsrrq2. /Type /StructElem %%EOF /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R 253 0 obj /K [37] /K [2] /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R /S /Document /S /P << 106 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 36 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R << /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 19 [212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R] P. 1.340(b). /Pg 21 0 R /P 473 0 R /Pg 34 0 R >> /Chartsheet /Part /Resources 358 0 R 30 0 obj /Group 409 0 R 122 0 obj /S /P /S /P >> /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj 242 0 obj << /S /P 307 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /S /P /K [33] endobj /Pg 29 0 R /K [7] 225 0 obj << /K [2] 244 0 obj >> /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. << endobj endobj /K [9] /S /P /K [33] /Pg 27 0 R The plaintiff argued such access was overbroad and would violate her right to privacy. /P 10 0 R /S /P << << 1.1: Collins Collins Muir + Stewart LLP, 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California 94612; (510) 844-5100. /K [17] /Type /StructElem /Group 364 0 R /K [13] /Contents [335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R] >> /P 10 0 R /K 26 << /K [4] endobj endobj 237 0 obj 101 0 obj endobj 86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 19 0 obj /K [6] Form 5 - AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. /Type /StructElem /P 471 0 R Specific Objections All objections to discovery requests must be specific. /S /LBody << 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R] /Annots [] /StructParents 7 133 0 obj >> 234 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /P 10 0 R 0000004751 00000 n /P 10 0 R /K [38] 0 /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 31 0 R /K [7] /Pg 26 0 R << /S /P >> >> /Type /StructElem /S /P << /S /P /P 10 0 R %%EOF P. 1.340(b). An interrogatory may ask for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or that asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 31 0 R 222 0 obj /P 472 0 R endobj /Group 404 0 R >> /K [0] /P 35 0 R 58 0 obj<> endobj >> /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem >> 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /P FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /P 10 0 R 246 0 obj >> endobj /K [1] /K [440 0 R 441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R 444 0 R 445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R 448 0 R 449 0 R endobj /S /P endobj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ia9defb5505ba11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-Responding-to-Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL). /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 13 0 R endobj endobj /K [10] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Pg 20 0 R For authorities updated in real time, please see the SmartRules Guide for the litigation document you are drafting. 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R << 114 0 obj /Type /StructElem All Rights Reserved. << >> /Type /StructElem /A 459 0 R endobj Form 1 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. >> << 296 0 obj endobj 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R <> << << endobj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [5] /S /Table #"4H$ _p \BE69 $"*C^_r wI='o*A01o%A%2x^18!3]=$x:0/"vKbUe|^b8E1#S D Gf^>#z_BF\T *DFhQ H$R!UsF%'X['Rad+I7b*:iYtd8I^\}=q&>LE4. endobj /S /P /K [1] /StructParents 11 /S /LBody /S /LBody /S /P /Length 484 0 R Interrogatories may contain specially defined terms, as long as these definitions are reasonable and not subject to misinterpretation. 109 0 obj << /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R A party may propound to another party thirty (30) interrogatories, including those from the official forms or custom drafted ones. The authorities cited in this At A Glance Guide are current as of the publication date. /Annots [] /K [14] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 14 0 R stream /S /P /K [7] /P 10 0 R << 6 and Document Request No. A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. << << /Type /StructElem << 0000001696 00000 n /Pg 30 0 R /S /P /Type /Catalog >> /Pg 27 0 R 57.105, which authorizes courts to award sanctions against parties who raise claims and defenses not supported by material facts. >> << 0000000016 00000 n >> /S /P /K [0] If the defendant has surveillance films or Facebook posts of your client and wants to use them as evidence, they must be disclosed AFTER the plaintiff's deposition. /K [8] 116 0 obj /P 10 0 R A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. >> The disputed discovery requests are Interrogatories 2-7, 12, 13, and 18, and Document Requests 12, 25-27, and 39. << P. 1.340(c). /K [2] endobj /S /P /P 472 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 29 0 R 281 0 obj /K [36] /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R <>/Metadata 14 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/Pages 8 0 R/StructTreeRoot 16 0 R/Type/Catalog/Names 71 0 R>> /P 10 0 R >> /K [482 0 R 317 0 R] << /S /P /Subtype /XML >> endobj endobj /Type /StructElem >> %PDF-1.4 % /S /P /Pg 16 0 R /S /P endobj /P 476 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R >> endobj /P 10 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 33 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 17 0 R endobj /Pg 14 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 23 0 R Mich. 2012) (holding that material posted on a private Facebook page is generally not privileged or protected by privacy claims); Mailhoit v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 285 F.R.D. 194 0 obj /K [10 0 R] endstream endobj 656 0 obj <>/Metadata 30 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 653 0 R/StructTreeRoot 174 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 657 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 658 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Subtype/Form/Type/XObject>>stream /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> endobj /Contents [410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R] endobj endobj |WxE*V M*Sh%F^erXXB*COS`"Lu /P 10 0 R /S /P /Worksheet /Part /S /P Carefully crafted interrogatories and requests for production may make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevent the discovery of social media information and more likely that defense attorneys are provided access to information that initiates a favorable resolution of their clients cases. . >> /S /P /S /P 290 0 obj /ParentTreeNextKey 25 285 0 obj 0000000016 00000 n << << 131 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R 217 0 obj 2023 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. /Pg 18 0 R >> /P 10 0 R endobj Absent compelling circumstances, failure to assert objections to an interrogatory within the time for answers constitutes a waiver and will preclude a party from asserting the objection in a response to a motion to compel. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Length 12 0 R /Group 379 0 R /Pg 18 0 R >> 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R] /Type /StructElem >> >> /P 472 0 R << endobj /Type /StructElem 0000051133 00000 n /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem 310 0 R 311 0 R 312 0 R 313 0 R 314 0 R 315 0 R 316 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R 319 0 R One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely . /K [2] qWgm%^yv&r8B41. 289 0 obj /S /P 177 0 obj << /Type /StructElem endobj /Annots [] /StructParents 20 /K [8] /K [3] /P 473 0 R /DisplayDocTitle true << >> OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES The Respondent, Judge Linda D. Schoonover, by and through her undersigned counsel, files her Objections to the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Special Counsel and says: Objection. Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. 0000177393 00000 n 75 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /K [34] 1, March 2018. /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /Page /Group 339 0 R 655 0 obj <> endobj %PDF-1.6 % /S /P /Artifact /Sect endobj /P 10 0 R endobj 190 0 obj 218 0 obj << << /Contents [360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R] << /S /P endobj (Do not identify anyone who simply typed or reproduced the responses.) /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R 17 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R >> /Type /Page This interrogatory is overbroad and would allow undue access into the Respondent's private information. << << >> /Pg 28 0 R 0000051314 00000 n endobj >> 18 [202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R] /Resources 408 0 R /P 441 0 R /Pg 34 0 R 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R] /P 449 0 R /P 323 0 R /Type /StructElem 293 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /S /LBody endobj endobj 121 0 obj /S /P /S /P /Type /StructElem 202 0 obj /P 10 0 R 209 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [13] 62 0 obj /K [468 0 R] 158 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R /K [286 0 R] endobj << /K [7] 0000007029 00000 n endobj /Type /StructElem 566 (C.D. 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R Criminal Charges Against Alec Baldwin Dropped, Fox News To Pay $787.5 Million to Dominion Voting Systems for Defamation, Paltrow Prevails in Celebrity Ski Crash Trial. /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 19 0 R /Type /Page Despite its ubiquity, many peopleincluding plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuitscontinue to share information on their social media accounts that can be a boon to defense counsel but disastrous to their own claims. 0000002293 00000 n /P 10 0 R << /IDTree 9 0 R /P 10 0 R /StructParents 13 << >> /K [12] endobj >> /S /P << >> << /K [6] /K [35] << >> /S /P /Type /Page /K [2] /Pg 13 0 R >> notice of serving plaintiff's answers to defendant uff's second set of interrogatories directed to plaintiff /Parent 6 0 R /K [4] /Type /StructElem 0000005048 00000 n 0000001255 00000 n /S /P << /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem << << >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 26 0 R 148 0 obj 169 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /K [7] /K [10] /P 473 0 R trailer << >> /P 472 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 34 0 R endobj This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. /S /P /K [464 0 R] endobj Specific objections should be matched to specific requests. /K [8] /Marked true 0000177044 00000 n << /Nums [0 [234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R 243 0 R << /Pg 34 0 R << /P 10 0 R 82 0 obj /S /P /Pg 34 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R endobj /K [9] /S /P Each defendant's responses to these requests are essentially identical, with the exception of Interrogatory No. /Pg 27 0 R 154 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R 132 0 obj /P 10 0 R 221 0 obj 172 0 obj << <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 23 0 obj All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. /S /P 280 0 R 281 0 R 282 0 R 43 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Group 429 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 29 0 R 117 0 obj /Type /StructElem A party must obtain permission of the court to send more than 10 additional interrogatories. 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R /Type /StructElem /ParentTree 11 0 R Summary Judgment vs Summary Adjudication What is the Difference? /A 453 0 R >> >> 1. The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. /P 472 0 R << 0000007100 00000 n /P 10 0 R endobj endstream endobj startxref >> 74 0 obj /P 472 0 R /P 10 0 R Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. /P 10 0 R << << 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R /P 10 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R <> << /S /P %%EOF >> /K [26] /StructParents 21 /S /P >> /Contents [430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R] << >> /K [1] /S /P /S /P /K [10] /ID [<35422D32342D38432D41352D35462D31>] 302 0 obj /K [7] /S /P 45 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R 74 0 obj 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R /S /L /K [10] /S /LBody >> /K [9] endobj /Parent 6 0 R << 314 0 obj /S /P 72 0 obj endobj >> /P 10 0 R >> /P 10 0 R << P9j+,?ej$N"tvdo6K^V [GInka<88[qG v\ +`8l.reO-ygFXxn'H7'S: V4C[Q Yd57XCr[&3))\JMp 207 0 obj 450 0 R 451 0 R 452 0 R] 0000006573 00000 n endobj >> << /K [462 0 R] endobj /P 10 0 R endobj << 0000007527 00000 n 171 0 obj /S /P <> /Type /StructElem /P 458 0 R 95 0 obj /K [3] /StructParents 9 endobj /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R wm%&8=3mM1S7v1mgM1Za.arN'6{)w]Na~c=vwgJV p.EjnM]Q}1r{ytlx)N^F;:X"5c+\CiKc\J*J6cER(b:DaTvFMU 59 0 obj endobj /K [2] /P 471 0 R 93 0 obj 0000005561 00000 n >> 269 0 obj /K [3] >> endobj >> , requires the respondent to answer an interrogatory separately and fully in writing and under oath, unless the respondent objects, in which event the party objecting shall state with specificity the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable. /Pg 16 0 R /P 466 0 R /P 10 0 R >> <> /S /P >> Co., 88 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App.